Sunday, May 3, 2015

It's Finally Over


This year has been very enjoyable; however, taking five classes is not the move for next semester. The World of the Hunger Games was my favorite class this semester though. I found expressing our feelings about different disciplines applied to the Hunger Games was rather insightful. I learned many things about the book I would have been able to break through its surface. For example, the switched gender roles implemented by Katniss and Peeta. I immediately thought that Peeta was just an emotional character to combat Katniss's distance; I would have never thought that they switched places in the relationship. All the material we covered was interesting to learn and I liked having that limitless knowledge about one trilogy that everyone will love to see in the movies. It was not challenging for me due to the simplicity of the workload; it may have been a lot of information, but it was manageable. 




Photos:
http://frabz.com/3tkk
http://www.quickmeme.com/Hunger-Games/?upcoming

Saturday, April 11, 2015

To Be Evil Or Not To Be Evil


As human beings, we ask many questions about morality. There is the reoccurring question of "What is the difference of evil?" or "How do people resort to committing evil actions?" I immediately think of the opposite of being "good." For example, superheroes act courageously for those in danger and for those they care about to produce the safety and happiness. They will also selfless where doing the right thing is their mantra. Many people who are "good" follow the golden rule: treat others the same you would like to be treated. Creating that respect for the individual, superheroes choose their decisions based on unconditional care for anyone who is need of help.


Dr. Josh Baron comments we must analyze four different theories before coming to a final conclusion on where evil comes from. First, we must look at utilitarianism and how this creates goodness in people. This ideology is the right to maximize utility or happiness. More so, utilitarian actions produce the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the greatest number of people. President Snow and President Coin may seem to be maximizing the happiness of the people of Panem or the people of District 13; however, they are more concerned about their desires of order or power over the happiness of the governed. 

Second theory is upholding to duty where people decide to do the right thing regardless of the consequences. Focusing of their obligation to keep order or to maintain happiness at all time high is what should be considered by all individuals. Next, Aristotle created a notion where to be a good person, one must be virtuous. There must be no type of excess or deficiency regarding traits of an individual. If one was to react to fear, one should be able to act courageous to be considered virtuous. For example, Katniss demonstrates virtue immediately in the trilogy when she decides to volunteer for the games just so her sister could be safe from the bloodbath. Lastly, care and love is considered when one makes decisions. Concluding on what is right and wrong for an individual involves the influence of their loved ones and what type of effect it would have on them. Every time Katniss did something in the games, she always thinks about Prim, Gale, and her mother before making a decision. She obviously makes a promise to Prim to stay alive because it would be detrimental for their family if she disappeared and was killed in the games. 

Overall, Dr. Baron uses all of these theories and highlights opposite of good in each. So the opposites of utility, duty, virtue, and care is individual, apathy, vice, and harm, respectively. The definition of evil, in his eyes, is an individual who expresses pleasure from causing harm to others as a result of vice or extreme apathy towards others humanity. President Snow and President Coin both embody this definition clearly.    





Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Sources:
Gresh, Chapter 7 The Nature of Evil
Guest Speaker: Dr. Josh Baron Ethics and Evil

Photos:
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/358388082818634023/
http://www.klce.com/whos-your-favorite-superhero/
http://perezhilton.com/tag/president_coin/
http://www.finalreel.co.uk/the-hunger-games-mockingjay-part-1-teaser-unity/the-hunger-games-mockingjay-part-1-president-snow-portrait-poster-slice/

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Who's Wearing the Pants In District 12?


In The Hunger Games, there is an obvious difference in traditional gender roles and romance compared to the majority of fictional novels. Typically, we have women being the ones pursued and saved, while men are the ones pursuing and saving. In addition to that, men are strong, emotionless, stern, and heroic, while women are weak, emotional, vulnerable, and sexualized. 


Katniss and Peeta are the perfect examples of reversed gender roles. Peeta is a baker who enjoys decorating cakes and painting pictures of nature; however, Katniss is a hunter who provides and protects for her family. Because of her father's death and her mother's depression, Katniss had to assume the role as the "man" of the house. Everyday, she would hunt for tonight's dinner, buy supplies for the house, and comfort Prim every night before she went to bed. Her job in her family is the job that a typical father would preform in his family. While she is in the games, she is a leader, rebellious, and desensitized from violence. Again, in novels, males have those traits where they are always making trouble and leading a justified cause. Katniss embodies more masculine than feminine traits throughout the trilogy.

Commenting on Peeta's demeanor, he is seen more feminine than masculine. Peeta has not endured anything remotely close to Katniss in his life. Being a part of baker's family, he already has the money to acquire supplies, food, and support his well being. Created by dependent lifestyle, Peeta is fragile and caretaker towards his loved ones. During the reaping, it was obvious that Peeta was upset with being chosen as District 12's tribute. On other hand, Katniss volunteered in place of Prim, showing no emotion and pushing her sister away from the scene. Throughout the games, Peeta is never the one to take action; he never successfully uses a weapon in combat either. Majority of the time, he is waiting for Katniss to act instead of deciding his own will. Lastly, Peeta has more sexual and charming appeal than Katniss ever will. The Capitol simply falls in love with Peeta during his interviews with Caesar Filckerman. He has the ability to "woo" the audience as if he was a beautiful girl with an audience full of males. 

In regards to romance in this trilogy, there is a forced romance between Katniss and Peeta. To develop appeal to District 12's tributes, the two must be displayed as "star-crossed lovers" who battle within the arena along side each other. Katniss does not want to be apart of this romance because it portrays her as weak (typically a male response.) Katniss does not want to kiss him either, but is forced by Haymitch to make something happen for the sponsors. This trilogy is not romance fiction, it is young adult, dystopian novel. Romance is lack luster, close to non-existent.



Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Sources:
Dr. Raley Guest Speaker on Conventional Romance and Gender Roles in The Hunger Games
Pharr and Clark Chapters 11 and 20

Photos:
http://www.memecenter.com/fun/1317829/peeta
http://www.dumpaday.com/random-pictures/funny-pictures/funny-pictures-day-80-pics-2/attachment/peeta-and-katniss-funny-quotes/
http://www.playbuzz.com/johnsl11/do-you-know-your-hunger-games-trilogy
http://rebloggy.com/post/mine-josh-hutcherson-peeta-mellark/28751362072
http://pixgood.com/quotes-by-josh-hutcherson.html
https://www.pinterest.com/bloomlolo/the-hunger-games/


Sunday, March 29, 2015

The Hunger Games and Appalachia


In The Hunger Games, there is an importance and significance of music. Some songs, such as "Deep in the Medow," "The Valley Song," or "The Hanging Tree," are examples of the music written in the books and played in the movies. District 12 is very comparable to Appalachia in regards to importance of music. Mr. Walt Michael said, "Ballads are songs that tell a story; these ballads tell stories about Appalachia." Typically, music do tell stories about something, whether it be about the tough life of a rapper or an unbearable break up. Everyone have different ways of expressing stories, and the people of Appalachia endured through the difficult setting of mountainous region. It was hard to create a living from the region because the terrain was not for farming. The major resource, in abundance, was coal; however, the acquisition of coal, itself, requires a tremendous amount of work and destruction. Much like Appalachia, Panem endures through plenty of hardships, such as starvation, hunger, lack of resources, etc. Especially District 12, the difficulty of life matches with the life in Appalachia. Reflecting on the major resources, District 12 also has coal mines to mirror that Appalachia as the same area. Katniss sings "The Hanging Tree," in front of her propo crew while she is in District 12; she learned the song from her dad when she was a child. The song was specifically used for a battle cry. The song tells a story of a metaphor of her experiences in the Hunger Games and the experiences she has with Peeta. When Peeta and Katniss are together, they are more concerned with protecting each other as they reach closer to their deaths in the Games.



Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Sources:
Guest Speaker, Mr. Walt Michael

Photos:

Sunday, March 8, 2015

How is this STILL a thing?

Totalitarian Regimes





There are many different types of government in the world, such as democracies, monarchies, and oligarchies. Out of the many governments, one is set apart from all the rest. This type of government does not condone any form of freedom; it serves the people through absolute control and repressive means of action. Totalitarian regimes represent the extreme of a prosperous government to abide. Some examples in literature involve 1984, Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World, and Handmaid's Tale. The Hunger Games trilogy is also a perfect example of a totalitarian regime. With President Snow, the Gamemakers, and the rest of the Capitol, the absolute power over the districts mimic and mirror some totalitarian regimes currently today.


The Soviet Union, run by Joseph Stalin, is one of those unforgettable regimes that all of the Earth knows. A man named Aleksander Solzhenitsyn was a member under his regime; unfortunately, he did not believe Stalin was a justified leader of the Soviet Union. Word got out of his criticism and Solzhenitsyn was sent to a labor camp of Stalin's choice. Refusing commands from the ones who the ran these camps, he was sent to a correctional facility in Siberia. While in Siberia, he wrote about his experiences as member of the camp. Another term for these specific camps was the GULAGS, which mirror the concept of districts in The Hunger Games. Through the gulags, Stalin tortured, imprisoned, exiled, starved, and killed many to the gulags. Twenty million innocent citizens fell victim to Stalin's reign.

  
Question is, why were these governments able to have absolute control over certain countries? Much like The Hunger Games, the Capitol and the Hunger Games's purpose is to maintain stability within Panem. References to North America, Panem is the battered down version of the United States. In the United States, there is lack of employment, no hope for jobs, and loss of homes. Banks have collapsed in the past, the economy is undeniably unstable, and the Democratic and Republican parties are never in agreement. The homeless are still homeless; the hungry are still hungry. Totalitarian regimes, in theory, are supposed to mend these ills that fall onto specific nations. Especially for those nations formidably in need, they require absolute change to be able to continue as a society. With absolute power, there can be absolute change within these nations.



Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Sources:
Of Bread, Blood, and The Hunger Games
The Hunger Games Companion

Photos:
https://freethoughtkampala.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/atheism-and-the-totalitarian-communist-regimes-of-the-20th-century/
http://www.citelighter.com/political-science/comparative-politics/knowledgecards/totalitarianism
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/06/11/oh-totalitarianism-where-art-thou/
http://cubanexilequarter.blogspot.com/2012/05/reclaiming-reconciliation-from.html
http://imgur.com/gallery/S0DGZ8J
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/05/10/u-s-war-on-drugs-all-cost-no-benefit-brings-more-people-to-prison-than-were-in-the-gulag-archipelago/
http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=48712
http://brightcitizen.com/united-states-falls-to-second-behind-china-in-size-of-economy-under-barak-obama/

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Reflection On Other's Blogs

Jeremy's Blog:

I enjoyed reading Jeremy's blog where he described certain characters introduced in the first and second books of The Hunger Games trilogy. Much like myself, one of my favorite characters is Finnick; I agree with Jeremy on how he is a bad ass with a trident. However, Jeremy's blog is unclear with certain explanations and details regarding the assignment. Reading his blog, there is no declaration of which Hunger Games book is his favorite. One can infer which is his favorite through his blog description where he is primarily describing Catching Fire. In addition, pictures would be a nice visual for a blog. Jeremy only has a single picture of Rue on his first blog entry. Posting pictures, videos, and visuals for readers is helpful to develop an understanding beyond the blogger's explanation.

Jeff's Blog:

Along with Jeremy's blog, I also enjoyed reading Jeff's blog as well. Reading someone's thoughts gives different perspectives about the blog entries we had to complete. Many individuals in this class have different reasons choosing this specific SIS as a class whether its enjoying the book, inspiration from outside sources, or just because they simply wanted to take the class. Jeff was influenced by his sister to take this class from her love of the Hunger Games. His description of his favorite character is  concrete and justifiable; Haymitch is a favorable character with his witty remarks and drunk outbursts. However, Jeff's blog does not have visuals that pull readers into certain blog entries. Adding different pictures will create a well-rounded blog that many will want to read.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Dr. Carpenter's Lecture

Dystopian description


Dystopian fictions are political, exploring particular social issues by setting up a horrific alternative world in which those issues are highly emphasized. These types of fictions are provocative, striking, and read eloquently like a sermon. An excellent example of dystopian fictions is The Hunger Games trilogy written by Suzanne Collins. This compelling, first person narrative is placed in an alternative world called Panem that is separated into twelve sections of the country; these twelve sections are called districts with different resources, classes, and lifestyles reflecting their image. Modeling a dictatorship, the twelve districts are governed by the all-powerful Capitol. To maintain stability and order, the Capitol forces each district to send a young woman and a young man into an arena to battle to the death.


A guest speaker, Becky Carpenter, notes particular, common characteristics that specify dystopian literature from other types of literatures. First, dystopias are often utopias that have gone terribly wrong with an unstable government, way of living, and censored freedom. In The Hunger Games trilogy, the Capitol believes it is stabilizing and creating order for Panem to completely prosper through this immoral, twisted entertainment called the Hunger Games. Pledging allegiance to the Capitol, each district follows these restrictive laws revolving around the Hunger Games. In reality, the Games are simply a reminder of the Capitol's dominance over the country.

Second characteristic noted by Dr. Carpenter is that dystopian societies value stability above all else where many is sacrificed to achieve said stability. Through severe forms of government, there is undeniable control over human rights, individuality, freedom, production, and the movement of goods. To solidify a presence of stability, the government advertises certain types of propaganda. The Capitol demonstrates its control by stationing guards in each of the districts, rationing certain goods, and preventing freedom and types of individualities. The Capitol also reminds the districts everyday to abide to President Snow with commercials, documentaries, announcements.  

Next, dystopian societies primarily serve the interest of a particular group while pretending to serve the interest of the many. In The Hunger Games, the particular group that the Capitol focused on were the individuals living in the Capitol, especially the higher-ups, such as President Snow and the Gamemakers. Adding to this, dystopias reflect contemporary cultural problems/issues, such as view of materialism, class disparity, and the role of mass media. The ones living in the Capitol are expected to dress elegantly and to judge others' etiquette, wardrobe, etc. Everything is noticed at face value; nothing within the individual is noticed or taken into consideration. A sense of perfect appearance is always on the minds of those who live in the Capitol. 


Lastly, dystopians frequently call out attention to ways in which we, America, may already be living in a dystopia. For example, dystopias stress the role of technology as a means of surveillance, power, and control. In America, the government has many ways to monitor individuals' actions to prevent any type of terrorism, rebellion, or illegal actions. Certain apps on the IPhone give the government a privilege to keep track of what Americans are using their phone for specifically. Making matters worse, dystopian societies often involve internalizing of propaganda to the point where the awareness of propaganda is what it is. The people of Panem attribute the Capitol with the idea of the Hunger Games; all of the propaganda for the Capitol is linked to the Hunger Games. Panem has seen all of the propaganda where it does not even phase the districts. The districts accept the Games as a normal function of their lives, much like holidays. 



  
Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Sources:
Tom Henthorne's Chapter 6: "Dystopia with a Difference"

Photos:
http://www.atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=15677
https://biscadmission.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/choosing-your-courses-for-first-year-at-the-bisc/
http://hungergames.biz/page/249/
http://www.hungergamesarena.com/photo/snow-1?context=user
https://pocketwatchkid.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/why-do-i-love-effie-trinket-so-much/
http://giphy.com/gifs/capitolcouture-the-hunger-games-catching-fire-movie-aPLviFa7zxtdu
http://article.wn.com/view/2014/11/20/Make_Sure_You_Are_Ready_For_The_Hunger_Games_Mockingjay_With/

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Gonna have to go with Number Two

Catching Fire 

Out of the books of the Hunger Games trilogy, my favorite would have to be the second book, Catching Fire. There are an abundant amount of aspects that this book specifically pulls me into enjoying it the most; for example, how the rebellion of the districts beginning develops a strong sense of anticipation and curiosity for what is going to happen next. With each book, I did feel the "edge of my seat" type of reading, but I found to have this certain feeling the strongest within the second book.
Because the setting, the story, and the characters are all already provided as a background information, a reader's curiosity is increased. Having this specific knowledge will give the chance for readers to predict, to wonder, and to expect how this story will unravel. When the tributes hold each other's hands after the Caesar's interview foreshadows, there is a sense of defiance where the districts can be able to unite even being oppressed by the Capitol. I found it rather endearing to see all the districts' tributes were able to see pass their differences to exploit who the real enemy of the Games is.


Another example that I separated this book from the other two was the character development of each character from the first book. There is a distinct difference between Haymitch in the first book compared to the second one. His personality is rather sobering ever since Katniss and Peeta won the games. Understanding this was an opening for hope, Haymitch realizes and shows care to the overarching situation of the Capitol's plan to suppress the districts further. He presents to be more of a mentor to Katniss and Peeta as if he cares for their well-being. Transitioning from a unforgiving drunk to a respectable teacher demonstrates his true personality and feelings. Expanding my view on Haymitch has given more of an opinion that the rebellion towards the Capitol will have a foundational of experience, knowledge, and strategy.

My favorite part of this book would have to be the diversity of the arena that represented the Quarter Quell. Since it was 75th anniversary of the Hunger Games, the gamemakers obviously had to make the Quarter Quell very special for those participating in such festivities. President Snow announces for previous victors to be chosen to enter another bloodbath to assert the Capitol's dominance over the twelve districts, which consist of Panem. Within the specific Hunger Games, the arena is a model of a clock where each hour divides the arena with a different and profound obstacle that the tributes will have to face. Previously said in last week's blog, there are storms of blood, carnivorous monkeys, acid fog, a tidal wave, and some unnamed. Visualizing the images of these certain obstacles enlisted fear within my mind generating an empathy for the tributes in the games.This setting also exploits the hatred and anger that the tributes have for the Capitol, such as Johanna having monologues with President Snow while trapped in the arena. Johanna represents another individual that is upset and tired of the Capitol's reign of power; Katniss is not the only who is acting defiantly. 






Books:
the Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Photos:
http://www.myhungergames.com/share-your-reviews-and-reactions-to-catching-fire
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/409475791094271795/
http://www.quickmeme.com/Drunk-Haymitch
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/403473-the-hunger-games
http://funny-pictures.picphotos.net/funny-hunger-games-arena/doblelol.com*uploads*17*catniss-funny.jpg/

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Between the Book and the Flim...PART 2


Just like the first book and film differences and similarities, there is a bunch of discretion and diversity between the two for the second book and film Catching Fire. Films, again, have a high tendency to leave specific, nitty, gritty details out that were stated in the book; sometimes, they even put their own twist to portray a scene, a character, a setting, etc. Having power to re-create the story can go either good or bad. There may be scenes not depicted correctly or appropriately. There may be actors who are the wrong person to be the specific character. However, there are times when the makers of the film are able to show the book very well to its audience where the criticism is minimal. 


Talking about one similarity and one difference, the book and the film both provide a great image and appearance of the arena during the Quarter Quell. I enjoyed watching the film where all tributes were supposed to swim from their starting spots to reach the land of the arena. Not knowing how to swim has given me more admiration to this book/film because I wish I was able to do that. Both keep the concept that the arena is simply a clock of misfortune; whatever region of the arena that the tribute(s) reside will be their fate. The horrors consist of acid fog, blood rain, a tidal wave, carnivorous monkeys, jabberjays that repeat the sounds of loved ones screaming for the tribute, and some are not even mentioned. Withstanding all of thsoes obstacles while trying to defend against the other twenty-two tributes is no walk in the park.




Shifting to an example of contrast, which I forgot to mention in my previous post, the huge difference that I found to create a new perspective and viewpoint for me was the narration style of the book compared to the movie. In all three books, Katniss is the main character and telling the story in her views, thoughts, and perceptions. I was seeing through the eyes of Katniss instead of an overarching, ambiguous perspective of the events occurring in Panem, the Capitol, or the arena. It does give a completely unseen and new look on the Games when watching the movie though because of the numerous perspectives, such as Katniss, Caesar Flickerman commentating, or the people back in the districts watching. It develops an overarching idea of what is going on as the story develops. We see Katniss, Peeta, and Finnick battling in the games; then, we see their districts, their mentors, and the Capitol all watching them. So simultaneously, there are two events going at the same time that the viewers can think about during this specific event. In the book, there is not much of that chain of events. Instead, there are flashbacks to Katniss's better days and unforgettable memories. There are also types of foreshadowing that give the reader a hunch that something will soon happen to Katniss.






Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Photos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQU6-pKOOFo
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=108388
http://thehungergames.wikia.com/wiki/Arena
http://imgarcade.com/1/hunger-games-2-arena/
http://lytherus.com/2013/08/30/hunger-games-explorer-adds-final-tribute-to-the-arena-bringing-with-it-a-new-still-from-the-film/



Sunday, February 8, 2015

Between the Book and the Film...


There are an abundant amount of differences between the Hunger Games book and film.  Being the first book I had actually enjoyed, I was able to pick the missing pieces of the book that were not in the film easily. Obviously, there are the similarities between two as well, but the makers of the film cut out a lot of small, important details, which could have developed a clearer impression with the audience.

Starting out with a few similarities, the love interest for Katniss (more like love triangle) is portrayed very well in both the film and the book. Peeta projects his love for her once he is interviewed by Caesar Flickerman. It is more certain with the film due to Josh Hutcherson's acting ability to create the embarrassed, sensitive, love ridden adolescent; this made picking up that his love was real. Not forgetting Gale, in the film, there are breaks from the games that cut to Gale watching. I noticed Gale was peeved by the scene Katniss passionately kissing Peeta; therefore, Gale must have some feelings for his hunting partner. Jealously does not sprout out of nowhere. Gale's initial feelings for her have been threatened by the boy with the bread. In the book, it is very much the same, but Katniss, since the book is in her view, explains her feelings for both Gale and Peeta: how she feels, how she reacts, what her thoughts are on both of them, etc.

Another similarity is the glorification of how inconsiderate the Capitol is. In both the book and the film, the citizens that live in the Capitol are shown as individuals who only care about the surface of the tributes. When Peeta and Katniss are in the chariot, the citizens are only considering how elegant they look in their clothes. Even when Peeta and Katniss raise their hands interlocked, the Capitol only sees a pair of tributes who might be displaying love or unity with one another. In reality, Katniss is not very good at displaying any sort of PDA, especially with someone she just met.


Regarding the differences, there are a multitude of scenes that I could choose. One difference that really hits me in the face is the way Katniss is portrayed in the film compared to the way she is in the book. While I was watching the movie, I noticed her personality seems to be more standoffish and unattractive. Don't get me wrong, Jennifer Lawrence is a beautiful actress, but watching the movie, she seemed rather undesirable based on her actions and words towards others. For example, the scene where they enter the Capitol Circle on the chariots show us how she did not want to be there. The people of the Capitol were overwhelming her, it even seemed that she was not interested in pleasing the crowd. Peeta even tried to grab her hand to help her relax, but Katniss did not want to hold his hand initially. In the book, Katniss is gripping onto Peeta's hand prior to their grand entrance to ease her nerves. Along with that, she accepts the applause and appreciation the people of the Capitol--she is waving, blowing kisses, and raises her hands interwoven with Peeta with unlimited adrenaline.


Books:
The Hunger Games

Photos:
https://litreactor.com/columns/book-vs-film-the-hunger-games
https://andreaserranodotcom.wordpress.com/category/joyce-gilliard-the-hunger-games-hair-stylist/
http://www.polyvore.com/hunger_games_love_triangle/set?id=46873579
http://rebloggy.com/post/gif-the-hunger-games-thg-katniss-everdeen-jennifer-lawrence-josh-hutcherson-peet/21444246945
http://love-death-hungergames.tumblr.com/

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Accomplishment, Desire, and Bread

Why?

Since I was little, I have always been curious about learning new and exciting things, and stories with out-of-this-world ideas have always appealed to me. Growing up, I was never one to read or write; I was more of a video game fanatic, and I loved games like Pokemon, Digimon, and Naruto. Those story lines gave me insight into how people want to participate in fantasy worlds and make them all their own. Diving into the story, being a part of what is going on, and maybe believing there is validity in some of the tale are all things that can capture an audience and help them create a connection with the story.  Being able to connect with a new world or story sends adrenaline through my veins and gives me the exciting feeling of being alive. If the character in my video game can make it through life-threatening missions, what's stopping me from making it through a simple English lecture?

One day, one of my ex-girlfriends was talking to her friends about this book with an obscure design on the front. At the time, she knew I disliked reading, so she never thought to explain the story to me, but me being curious, I asked her about the book. Confused, she told me the book was called The Hunger Games. What was this book about? Was it about people who were hungry? Do the characters challenge each other in eating contests? She insisted that I read the book myself to find the answers to my questions.

After a week, I finished the book. Wanting the see what happens in the final two, I continued to read them. I have never been so drawn, connected, and emotionally torn about a book in my entire life. I was able to widen my interests from just video games to all forms of storytelling including books and their movie adaptations. Reading The Hunger Games gave me a better understanding of why people read; it changes them. It provides different perspectives; It outlines fears, desires, and needs influenced by society. It causes readers to grow in knowledge. It makes readers aware.

Getting to the point, I chose to take this class because I wanted to gain insight, explore unknown concepts, and broaden the opinions I have on the book based on my previous readings of it. I absolutely love this book and all of the symbolism, characters, and themes that make up such a provocative story line. Along with my desire to learn what I do not know, I want to be able expand my view on books, movies, video games, and even people. I want to be able to dig deeper into the story and see Peeta as more than just a lover boy and Gale as more than the jealous best friend. 



What?

Relating back to the first question, I want to be able look past the cover of book. Everyone says "Don't judge a book by its cover," but I feel like I am one those individuals who judges many things without giving myself a chance to like them. I want to be more open-minded, okay with new, obscure things, and be able to accept different backgrounds, perspectives, etc. 

I also want to learn more about the books origin. Again, I was never much of a book worm, but I always wonder how books come to be the wonderful pieces of paper they are today. Obviously, there is so much thought spent on creating the book; editing several times, and countless spell checks. Looking past technical issues, where does the author, in this case Suzanne Collins, acquire the inspiration to create a piece of work to move millions? Does she do it because she thinks it's fun? Did something happen to her when she was a kid? Does she want to give more insight on dystopian government and comment on how close we are to it?

I would like to be able to explore the wonderful world of The Hunger Games and truly expand on my thoughts and beliefs. 


Who?

Out of all of the characters in The Hunger Games trilogy, my absolute favorite character would have to be Peeta Mellark. Reading through the first book, I really loved Katniss, The Girl on Fire, but the Boy with the Bread stood out to me more. Of course, Katniss has impressive survival skills, an attractive personality, and the ability to kill me in a second; however, I saw easier through Peeta's eyes than through hers. A flustered, young man paired up with his long time crush was a very relatable story. His words spoke to me whenever he was talking about Katniss and it was easy to see that he was a genuine character.

From the beginning, Peeta entered the games as Peeta, and left as the same person. I mean maybe a little more mentally scarred from nearly dying twice by Cato's blade, but that is beside the point. Before entering the arena, Peeta said, "I don't know how to say it exactly. Only... I want to die as myself... I don't want them to change me in there. Turn me into some kind of monster that I'm not" ( Collins 141).  This line has stuck with me ever since I first read the book. I was fifteen at the time, and four years later those words continue to resonate with me.


When I was growing up, I was ALWAYS picked, teased, bullied, and criticized for who I was. I was never seen as an accepted individual when I went to school, to practice, to work, or even at home. I wanted to change everything about me, so the world would stop badgering me to be everything I am not. Both my father and mother encouraged me to be strong and continue to be me:"Just because society is telling you that no one will like the color of your hair, how tight your pants are, or what logo is on your shirt, it should not take away from who you are. Embrace who you stand for. You stand for yourself." Through adversity, I haven't changed a single thing about myself, and if I have, it was only to better myself to improve, to surpass those who don't believe in my capabilities. I feel for Peeta because I see a lot of myself in his character. He may not be perfect, but he is pretty damn cool.

  

Books:
The Hunger Games
Catching Fire
Mockingjay

Photos: 
http://imgkid.com/frustrated-meme.shtml
http://www.fandango.com/movie-news/time-for-peeta-vs-gale-744593
http://memekid.com/hunger-games-memes-gale.htm
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/the-hunger-games/images/30195353/title/hunger-games-gifs-fanart
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/peeta-mellark/images/29957096/title/quotes-fanart
http://boywiththesnares.tumblr.com/post/11136503657